|
|
Symposia > PauliAffective neuroscience: Fear and painChair: P. Pauli, Abstract: This symposium deals with basic and applied research questions in the field of affective neuroscience focusing on fear and pain. The first talk (Pauli) will elaborate basic context conditioning mechanisms which might plan an important role for the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders, and will present first results on reinstatement of fear related to context conditioning as reflected in startle response modulation. The second talk (Miltner) mainly deals with phobia and associated biases in information processing. fMRI studies revealing how treatment affects theses biases will be presented. The third talk (Angrilli) will present data on the emotion pain interaction with a focus on gender differences using ERPs as dependent measure. The fourth talk (Montoya) will present brain response data of chronic pain patients triggered by the processing of facial simuli, expressing pain or other emotions. The final talk (Esteves) will present new results on the emotional effects of the putative pheromone androstadienone on human participants, i.e., an enhanced startle reflex modulation related to pleasant and unpleasant pictures in the absence of an effect in ratings. Talk 1:Context fear conditioning in humansP. Pauli, E. Glotzbach, M. Andreatta, & A. Mühlberger University of Würzburg, Germany During extinction a fear eliciting stimulus is experienced without aversive consequences and consequently conditioned fear responses decrease. Previous studies on cue conditioning revealed reinstatement of fear, meaning that extinguished fear responses can return after the presentation of the unconditioned stimulus (US) indicating fear memory is not erased but inhibited. In contextual conditioning an aversive event is linked to a complex context. Until now it is unsettled which effects extinction and reinstatement have on contextual fear memories. To study contextual conditioning in humans we created two immersive virtual environments (office rooms). On day one participants (N=24) received electric stimuli (US) in one context (CXT+) but never in a second context (CXT-). On day two participants underwent extinction. On day three, one unsignaled US was presented and afterwards participants were again exposed to the two contexts. We found successful fear acquisition on day one as reflected in startle potentiation and higher arousal in CXT+ compared to CXT-. Furthermore, physiological and explicit fear responses were extinguished at the end of day 2. After US presentation on day 3, fear responses returned as indicated by increased startle and arousal ratings for CXT+ compared to CXT-. In sum, we found reinstatement of contextual fear on physiological and explicit levels in analogy to cue conditioning studies. This return of contextual fear may account for relapse in anxiety disorders mainly characterized by sustained anxiety states like generalized anxiety disorder or agoraphobia. Talk 2:Neural Basis of Biased Information Processing in Phobics and its Modulation by Exposure TherapyWolfgang H. R. Miltner Department of Psychology, University of Jena, Gemany Many studies have demonstrated biased processing of threat information in phobics and patients with other anxiety disorders. Functional MRI data and data from other imaging methods like ERPs and source analysis of neural activities indicate that several neural networks in the brain of these subjects are critical for this processing peculiarities including the amygdala, the anterior insula, the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and several networks of the frontal brain including Brodmann area 9 and 10, and the ventromedial part of the orbitofrontal cortex. Several fMRI and ERP-studies will be presented that show increased activities of these structures in phobics as compared to non-phobic subjects when subjects were exposed to threatening stimuli of personal concern as compared to general threatening or neutral stimuli. In the second section of the presentation results of three studies will be presented that show that the hyperactivities of these brain structures might become significantly modified in accordance with subjects fear behaviors and subjective experiences in response to threat following brief periods of exposure therapy. Talk 3:Gender differences in pain responses under emotional stimulation: an ERP studyAlessandro Angrilli & Francesca Fardo, Department of Psychology, University of Padova, Italy Research on pain and emotions has shown clear gender differences in psychophysiological responses of these domains, however less investigation has been carried out on the interaction between the two variables. In the present experiment, emotions were elicited through five categories of pictures with different content, valence and arousal: pleasant (erotic and sport), neutral (household objects) and unpleasant (threat and mutilation). During the 4s picture presentation, electrical painful stimuli were delivered to the left forearm with a fixed intensity of 40% above subjective pain thresholds. 17 female and 17 male participants were required to watch each picture and then to rate the perceived pain intensity and the picture pleasantness on two 10 point visuo-analogue scales. Results showed for erotic pictures compared with the other four categories, decreased self- perceived pain intensity (F4= 15.11, p<0.001) and dampened N150 and P260 (F4 >5.69, p<0.001) amplitudes independently from gender. Also Sport pictures were able, although to a less extent, to evoke dampened pain perception compared with mutilation slides, and no clear self-perceived pain differentiation was found among neutral, threat and mutilation pictures. In addition, a significant Gender by Eelectrode by Category interaction (F8,256= 2.08, p< 0.05) for the N150 component was found. Women showed N150 amplitude significantly varying across all categories while males had smaller N150 to erotic compared with all other categories. Men and women showed clear differences in emotion modulation of pain responses with women exhibiting a stronger and more complex modulation. Talk 4:Brain responses to others’ expressions of pain in chronic pain patientsP. Montoya, A.M. González-Roldán, M.A. Muñoz, I. Cifre, & C. Sitges Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNCS), University of the Balearic Islands, Spain It is well-known that facial expression is one of the most relevant components of pain and that viewing others’ emotional faces may influence our own affective mood. Nevertheless, little is known about physiological responses to pain and other emotional faces in chronic pain patients. Event-related potentials (ERPs) and brain oscillations, corrugator activity, and heart rate were recorded in 20 patients with fibromyalgia and 20 pain-free controls, while they were passively viewing pain, anger, happy and neutral faces. In addition, ratings of valence and arousal elicited by the faces were obtained. Pain and anger faces elicited greater unpleasantness, arousal and corrugator activity than happy and neutral faces in all participants. Results also indicated that brain and heart rate responses to pain, anger and happy faces were different in fibromyalgia patients and pain-free controls. Thus, fibromyalgia patients displayed more enhanced ERP amplitudes, larger theta power and more reduced alpha power to pain and anger faces, as well as more prominent cardiac deceleration to anger faces than to either happy or neutral faces. Pain-free controls showed larger ERP amplitudes to happy faces than to negative faces. These findings indicate that information processing in fibromyalgia patients was characterized by enhanced defensive reactions and increased mobilization of attention resources to pain and anger faces, as well as by reduced allocation of attention to happy faces. Furthermore, our results suggest that pain symptoms in fibromyalgia would be worsened by a greater vulnerability to negative mood and an inappropriate response to positive emotions. Talk 5:Emotional effects of the putative pheromone androstadienone on human participantsF. Esteves & Patrícia Arriaga University Institute of Lisbon/ISCTE, Portugal The existence of human pheromones is widely accepted among layman. However, the scientific evidence for possible effects on humans is scarce and still under scrutiny. The goal of this experiment was to test possible effects of androstadienone on mood changes (verbal evaluation) and peripherical psychophysiological measures (skin conductance, heart rate and modulation of the startle reflex). Sixty female participants were randomly assigned by two double-blind male experimenters to the experimental group (exposed to androstadienone) or to a control condition. They had to rate their mood before and after the experiment, and look to a series of emotional pictures (pleasant, unpleasant and neutral) while their skin conductance, heart rate, and startle reflex were monitored. In general, no differences between groups were obtained in the subjective ratings of the pictures and in the mood ratings before and after the exposure. However, the analysis of the eyeblink response comparing positive versus negative pictures showed a significant interaction between Group and Valence, revealing a better differentiation between positive and negative images in the experimental group. Although the general pattern of results is unclear, the fact that exposure to androstadienone seems to enhance the emotional differentiation between positive and negative stimuli, could be interpreted as a higher sensitivity to emotional material after exposure to androstadienone. |
Online user: 1 | RSS Feed |